Is the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?
Puff Bar is a good alternative to a traditional ice cream treat because it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is manufactured with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it normally as you want without needing to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s great for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, which was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we are exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the biggest issues in public health today is obesity and diet. For that reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose weight can easily do so if they only need to carry around the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have already been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert that allows you to put it into your mouth, because of this you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you may go. If the product also has an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of regulations. The reason being that since there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke another one.
Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. As well as sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco in to the marketplace.
Plus the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes that you can buy could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs Element Vape Discount Code will replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to the younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative that may not provide them with nicotine.
It seems that the UK government may have a point. There is currently no requirement for tobacco companies to add warning labels on the products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which implies that fewer people will purchase them.